| WELCOME! |
| THE MUSEUM |
| VISIT US |
| EXHIBITIONS |
| NEWS |
|
|
| WHAT'S ON? |
| SCHOOL/KIDS |
| RESTORATION |
| RESEARCH |
| DOCUMENTATION |
| CONTACT US |
| SEARCH |
|
5.5
Conclusion, Item 5
The working group has carefully
assessed previously obtained information together with new
evidence. The group considers the reports made by
Hovdenak/Hoel and Riiser-Larsen to be thorough and
comprehensive. It has not been possible to follow up all of
the information and finds that have been made available, or
verify some of the older information in cases where relevant
documentation has been lost. In these areas, the group has
based its conclusions on previous assessments, or in some
cases has chosen to disregard the information altogether. The
information that has made an essential contribution towards
shedding new light on the incident has largely been provided
by the Institute of Marine Research in Bergen, the Main Rescue
Co-ordinaiton Centre for North Norway and the Norwegian
Meteorological Institute. By combining all of the available
information and related analyses, two possible locations for
the accident have arisen. One off the island of Karlsøy and
the other in the area south and west of Bjørnøya. Today, given the facts and information available, it is not possible to reach a conclusion with regard to where the “Latham” incident took place, without validation, or invalidation, of the wreckage that the “Kvitholmen” brought to the surface in 1933. Locating and raising this piece of wreckage may bring us closer to a solution. An analysis of the sheet of plywood on Edgeøya island will only serve to strengthen the theory that the accident occurred west of Bjørnøya.
|